Im afraid I cannot assist with that as I don't work for Pivotal. But CF_TRACE=true cf ssh appX.... might provide more information. <bren(a)juanantonio.info> wrote:

Hi Simon, I have updated CF CLI but I receive the following error: C:\Users\A611654>cf ssh appX -c ls -skip-host-validation FAILED Error: SSH session allocation failed: ssh: unexpected packet in

IIRC in recent version of the CLI a plugin for SSH is not necessary. <bren(a)juanantonio.info> wrote:

Following the document: https://docs.pivotal.io/pivotalcf/customizing/diego-ssh/access-apps.html I can't install the plugin to execute the call: C:\Users\USER_X>cf install-plugin Diego-SSH -r

Many thanks Daniel, I go with cf files! JAB

With diego `cf files` no longer works. You should use `cf ssh` to look

Hi, Recently, PWS deploy apps using Diego but if you have an app deployed with Diego, I can use the following method: http://apidocs.cloudfoundry.org/226/files/retrieve_file.html Error: the

Hi Stephen, 1. I agree with you that CF subsystems are not the best place to get the sources. Every IT team should be responsible of the code deployed but the method is available to use, I mean.

The Loggregator team has completed two epics (Metron->Doppler TCP and Loggregator as a separate release[1[]) and the roadmap has been updated to show that. A number of additional items have been added

This is exactly what I was looking for. Thanks for the quick response Eric and Steven!

Hi David, For Windows, the actual implementation of application security groups is done with Windows Firewall rules, instead of with iptables. From an external perspective they should function

Hello Carlo, As Christopher mentioned, we don't currently have this feature on the roadmap. I'm interested in exploring this with you, but we are concerned about the complexity of this change

Hi, David, Docker-image-based apps run as garden-linux containers, so the application security group rules will apply to them exactly as they do for buildpack-based apps running on the cflinuxfs2

Do application security groups work with Docker and Windows-based apps? Digging into the code a little bit, it appears that they are in the Garden API. Therefore I was assuming they work for any

Some consideration: 1. CloudFoundry / Bluemix doesn't necessarily store source code if your language is a compiled language (Java, C# etc). For interpreted languages like JavaScript/Node.js

I think this community is a good place for questions regarding bluemix https://developer.ibm.com/answers/ [] Leo wrote:

Maybe you raise this issue to bluemix itself. bren(a)juanantonio.info> wrote:

If there's interest in having this, we can give it a shot. Our idea was to have a per-application switch rather than a global on/off switch but we're obviously open to discussion about the signaling

Hi All, We've put together a proposal for exposing Tasks. The goal of exposing this feature is to enhance the cloud controller and the cf cli to support the ability for a space developer to create

As part of exposing routes with a path functionality we want to squeeze in a new column in the output of the `cf routes` command: $cf routes Getting routes as diesk ... space host domain