Hi, Currently, DEA can specified to a "zone", and Cloud Controller can schedule APP instance according to

"found no compatible cell" is the error you will get when all diego Cells have failed to deploy. Start by double checking that the cell is up and running via `bosh vms`. -Ted

Hi, Christian, Thanks for asking. From what you've described, it sounds like Cloud Controller is able to tell Diego to run the app, but the app instance isn't getting placed on a cell. It's probably

Hi, all, If you've tried using the 3126 Warden stemcell for your CF and Diego deployments to BOSH-Lite, you will likely have discovered that Diego doesn't deploy correctly. As it turns out, there is

On the CAB call Dr. Nic asked about support in the routing tier for connection draining. I asked him out-of-band to elaborate, then realized this was a topic the community might be interested in. Nic

Hi all, Here's an update on this topic and the design discussions Assk, Ben and I had in the last few days: I'll start with a description of the problem we're trying to solve here: Abacus currently

Hi, I tried with the lower as well as higher limit, but the instruction is keep hanging and no packets recieved. ubuntu(a)test:~$ ping github.com -M dont -s 1400 PING github.com (192.30.252.131)

Hey Deepak, I found that you provided some more information about your problem on Github: https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cf-release/issues/823 Was there any message from the ping about why packets

Have you checked the control script logs in the `/var/vcap/sys/log/` folder? If the jobs are failing to start that's a good place to start. If you send them to us we can tell you more. Also, what

Hi Daniel, I tried curl -vv https://github.com/cloudfoundry/java-buildpack/ from the instance(on openstack) where CF is installed and that works. Regarding offline buildpacks, CF already has offline

Hi Eric, Thank you. I am responding below with what I have available. Unfortunately, when the problem presents, developers are down so the current resolution is recreate cells. Looking at one below

Yes Will, that summary is essentially correct. But, for even more clarity let me restate the complete story again and reason I want 92085170 to work across stemcell upgrades. :) Today if NATS goes

Hi. I am trying to integrate with application(Java/Spring) authentication with an SSO through Kerberos. Has anyone done this before, I am using tomcat 8, openjdk 7 with java-buildpack version 3.0.

Hi Mike, What I think you're saying is that once the new `prune_on_config_unavailable` property is available in the router, and if it's set to `false`, there's a case when NATs is not reachable from

Okay.. Let me try with it.. Thanks..

Subnet ranges on which your other components are provisioned. allow_from_entries: - 192.168.33.0/24 wrote:

Hello Ronak, Actually, previously i have given the values for ALLOW_FROM_ENTRIES, after seeing some mail groups only i changed it to NULL. Could you tell me which IP i need to give

Hi Parthiban, In your manifest , there is a global property block nfs_server: address: 192.168.33.53 allow_from_entries: - null - null share: null allow from entries are

Thanks Amit for your faster reply. FYI, I have shared my deployment manifest too. I got struck in this issue for past couple of weeks. Thanks..

Hi Parthiban, Sorry to hear your deployment is still getting stuck. As Warren points out, based on your log output, it looks like an issue with NFS configuration. I will ask the CAPI team, who are