|
Re: [abacus] Refactor Aggregated Usage and Aggregated Rated Usage data model
Hi all,
Here's an update on this topic and the design discussions Assk, Ben and I
had in the last few days:
I'll start with a description of the problem we're trying to solve here:
Abacus currently
Hi all,
Here's an update on this topic and the design discussions Assk, Ben and I
had in the last few days:
I'll start with a description of the problem we're trying to solve here:
Abacus currently
|
By
Jean-Sebastien Delfino
·
#2869
·
|
|
Re: Unable to deploy application
Hi,
I tried with the lower as well as higher limit, but the instruction is keep hanging and no packets recieved.
ubuntu(a)test:~$ ping github.com -M dont -s 1400
PING github.com (192.30.252.131)
Hi,
I tried with the lower as well as higher limit, but the instruction is keep hanging and no packets recieved.
ubuntu(a)test:~$ ping github.com -M dont -s 1400
PING github.com (192.30.252.131)
|
By
Deepak Arn <arn.deepak1@...>
·
#2868
·
|
|
Re: Unable to deploy application
Hey Deepak,
I found that you provided some more information about your problem on
Github: https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cf-release/issues/823
Was there any message from the ping about why packets
Hey Deepak,
I found that you provided some more information about your problem on
Github: https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cf-release/issues/823
Was there any message from the ping about why packets
|
By
CF Runtime
·
#2867
·
|
|
Re: REGARDING_api_z1/0_CANARY_UPDATE
Have you checked the control script logs in the `/var/vcap/sys/log/`
folder? If the jobs are failing to start that's a good place to start. If
you send them to us we can tell you more.
Also, what
Have you checked the control script logs in the `/var/vcap/sys/log/`
folder? If the jobs are failing to start that's a good place to start. If
you send them to us we can tell you more.
Also, what
|
By
CF Runtime
·
#2866
·
|
|
Re: Staging Error while deploying application on OpenStack
Hi Daniel,
I tried curl -vv https://github.com/cloudfoundry/java-buildpack/ from the instance(on openstack) where CF is installed and that works.
Regarding offline buildpacks, CF already has offline
Hi Daniel,
I tried curl -vv https://github.com/cloudfoundry/java-buildpack/ from the instance(on openstack) where CF is installed and that works.
Regarding offline buildpacks, CF already has offline
|
By
D vidzz
·
#2865
·
|
|
Re: diego: disk filling up over time
Hi Eric,
Thank you.
I am responding below with what I have available. Unfortunately, when the
problem presents, developers are down so the current resolution is recreate
cells. Looking at one below
Hi Eric,
Thank you.
I am responding below with what I have available. Unfortunately, when the
problem presents, developers are down so the current resolution is recreate
cells. Looking at one below
|
By
Tom Sherrod <tom.sherrod@...>
·
#2864
·
|
|
Re: Garden Port Assignment Story
Yes Will, that summary is essentially correct. But, for even more clarity
let me restate the complete story again and reason I want 92085170 to work
across stemcell upgrades. :)
Today if NATS goes
Yes Will, that summary is essentially correct. But, for even more clarity
let me restate the complete story again and reason I want 92085170 to work
across stemcell upgrades. :)
Today if NATS goes
|
By
Mike Youngstrom <youngm@...>
·
#2863
·
|
|
SSO Kerberos with Spring
Hi.
I am trying to integrate with application(Java/Spring) authentication with an SSO through Kerberos. Has anyone done this before, I am using tomcat 8, openjdk 7 with java-buildpack version 3.0.
Hi.
I am trying to integrate with application(Java/Spring) authentication with an SSO through Kerberos. Has anyone done this before, I am using tomcat 8, openjdk 7 with java-buildpack version 3.0.
|
By
Leumas Yajiv
·
#2862
·
|
|
Re: Garden Port Assignment Story
Hi Mike,
What I think you're saying is that once the new
`prune_on_config_unavailable` property is available in the router, and if
it's set to `false`, there's a case when NATs is not reachable from
Hi Mike,
What I think you're saying is that once the new
`prune_on_config_unavailable` property is available in the router, and if
it's set to `false`, there's a case when NATs is not reachable from
|
By
Will Pragnell <wpragnell@...>
·
#2861
·
|
|
Re: CF-RELEASE v202 UPLOAD ERROR
Okay.. Let me try with it.. Thanks..
Okay.. Let me try with it.. Thanks..
|
By
Parthiban Annadurai <senjiparthi@...>
·
#2860
·
|
|
Re: CF-RELEASE v202 UPLOAD ERROR
Subnet ranges on which your other components are provisioned.
allow_from_entries:
- 192.168.33.0/24
wrote:
Subnet ranges on which your other components are provisioned.
allow_from_entries:
- 192.168.33.0/24
wrote:
|
By
Ronak Banka
·
#2859
·
|
|
Re: CF-RELEASE v202 UPLOAD ERROR
Hello Ronak,
Actually, previously i have given the values for
ALLOW_FROM_ENTRIES, after seeing some mail groups only i changed it to
NULL. Could you tell me which IP i need to give
Hello Ronak,
Actually, previously i have given the values for
ALLOW_FROM_ENTRIES, after seeing some mail groups only i changed it to
NULL. Could you tell me which IP i need to give
|
By
Parthiban Annadurai <senjiparthi@...>
·
#2858
·
|
|
Re: CF-RELEASE v202 UPLOAD ERROR
Hi Parthiban,
In your manifest , there is a global property block
nfs_server:
address: 192.168.33.53
allow_from_entries:
- null
- null
share: null
allow from entries are
Hi Parthiban,
In your manifest , there is a global property block
nfs_server:
address: 192.168.33.53
allow_from_entries:
- null
- null
share: null
allow from entries are
|
By
Ronak Banka
·
#2857
·
|
|
Re: CF-RELEASE v202 UPLOAD ERROR
Thanks Amit for your faster reply. FYI, I have shared my deployment
manifest too. I got struck in this issue for past couple of weeks. Thanks..
Thanks Amit for your faster reply. FYI, I have shared my deployment
manifest too. I got struck in this issue for past couple of weeks. Thanks..
|
By
Parthiban Annadurai <senjiparthi@...>
·
#2856
·
|
|
Re: CF-RELEASE v202 UPLOAD ERROR
Hi Parthiban,
Sorry to hear your deployment is still getting stuck. As Warren points
out, based on your log output, it looks like an issue with NFS
configuration. I will ask the CAPI team, who are
Hi Parthiban,
Sorry to hear your deployment is still getting stuck. As Warren points
out, based on your log output, it looks like an issue with NFS
configuration. I will ask the CAPI team, who are
|
By
Amit Kumar Gupta
·
#2855
·
|
|
Re: CF-RELEASE v202 UPLOAD ERROR
Hello All,
Is there anything i need to change on my CF Deployment
Manifest for the deployments or not? Could you please help on this to
solve? Thanks.
wrote:
Hello All,
Is there anything i need to change on my CF Deployment
Manifest for the deployments or not? Could you please help on this to
solve? Thanks.
wrote:
|
By
Parthiban Annadurai <senjiparthi@...>
·
#2854
·
|
|
Re: Bosh release for Docker
Hi Rajesh,
Not if you don't make it aware.
Only the broker gets registered at the router, then it gets registered at the CC. When containers are created (on request of the CC/broker, by the Docker
Hi Rajesh,
Not if you don't make it aware.
Only the broker gets registered at the router, then it gets registered at the CC. When containers are created (on request of the CC/broker, by the Docker
|
By
Vedran Lerenc <vlerenc@...>
·
#2853
·
|
|
Re: Pluggable Resource Scheduling
+1 having this pluggable scheduling feature !
--
tcnksm
2015年11月14日(土) 6:55 Deepak Vij (A) <deepak.vij(a)huawei.com>:
+1 having this pluggable scheduling feature !
--
tcnksm
2015年11月14日(土) 6:55 Deepak Vij (A) <deepak.vij(a)huawei.com>:
|
By
taichi nakashima
·
#2852
·
|
|
bosh-lite diego "found no compatible cell"
Hi
I installed bosh-lite on my mac according to the docs on
https://github.com/cloudfoundry-incubator/diego-release
That worked all fine, I can deploy apps without diego enabled and they
run as
Hi
I installed bosh-lite on my mac according to the docs on
https://github.com/cloudfoundry-incubator/diego-release
That worked all fine, I can deploy apps without diego enabled and they
run as
|
By
Christian Stocker <chregu@...>
·
#2851
·
|
|
Bosh release for Docker
I have a few questions on the Bosh release for Docker
https://github.com/cloudfoundry-community/docker-boshrelease
The documentation says:
There are 3 deployment scenarios for this BOSH
I have a few questions on the Bosh release for Docker
https://github.com/cloudfoundry-community/docker-boshrelease
The documentation says:
There are 3 deployment scenarios for this BOSH
|
By
Rajesh Jain <rjain15@...>
·
#2850
·
|