Hello, Until today I have been a happy user of CloudFoundry Maven plugin version 1.1.2: https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cf-java-client It worked for me pretty well. Unfortunately after having

You can avoid the local disk issues by using bosh.io like so -- bosh upload release https://bosh.io/d/github.com/cloudfoundry/cf-release?v=202

Try using df to watch the local filesystems while the upload is running. If you bump 100% anywhere you have the culprit. Either fix that, more space or a link to a filesystems with more space. Or

Hello John, Based on your suggestions, I tried to upload from /tmp. Still it throws the Error. For your Reference I have attached the ScreenShot. Could you please take a look on that?

I have only ever needed the app version when counting requests served by a specific app build. It's not a common use case and it was easy to work around, so it wasn't really an issue. I was not

thank you for sharing this! i know someone else was working on a similar thing. CFF team, do we have a place to curate lists of service brokers? bosh.io is a great place to list bosh releases [0],

exciting work ben, scott, and all involved thus far! this is great news to anyone wanting to integrate with cloud foundry from a client with java api interoperability, which covers a large number of

I'm happy to announce the availability of CF Abacus v0.0.2-rc.1 (incubating). Abacus provides usage metering and aggregation for Cloud Foundry services and app runtimes. This release candidate is

This is awesome! Using reactive-streams is particularly inspired. Congrats and I'm very much looking forward to this work. Will v1 receive support for individually addressable IPs, or will that

What services do you want to define this default plan for? Natalie & Mikhail Runtime & OSS Integration

The application version really represents the versioned metadata for the application. It changes regularly. [1] The only guarantee for version is that it will change if the app restarts (could be due

I was also assuming that app version would not change between app restarts (when the same droplet is used). I was wrong. Would it make more sense if the app version was the droplet shasum?

Hi, Tom, Thanks for asking. The Diego team has a semi-supported tool called 'veritas' (at https://github.com/pivotal-cf-experimental/veritas) that can give similar sorts of diagnostics on the command

> what will be the scope for securing internal Abacus pipeline that Assk describes as system token ? It is 'abacus.usage.write'. Updated my previous statements to make it more specific: We have

Makes sense, and just to complete - what will be the scope for securing internal Abacus pipeline that Assk describes as system token ? Piotr

Since usage reporting service is reporting usage for an account, for an organization or for a set of organizations, Abacus delegates the authorization to account and organization information resource

Thanks that's a really nice job !

Throwing this out there for anyone who might find it useful. https://github.com/epoelke/rds-service-broker

Hi, thanks for your reply. I understood that "application_version" is mainly used by CF components so I cannot used it as an actual version of application. Thanks. Hiroaki UKAJI -- View this

Hey Piotr, To read usage I believe you'll need 'abacus.usage.read', as 'abacus.usage.write' is for, well... writing. P.S. That reminds me of a period of my life long time ago when I was a contractor