|
Re: REST API endpoint for accessing application logs
Hi Ponraj,
It could be that your token may have expired. Also, silly question but you may want to check that you have access to the app in question. A good way to verify this is by running `cf logs
Hi Ponraj,
It could be that your token may have expired. Also, silly question but you may want to check that you have access to the app in question. A good way to verify this is by running `cf logs
|
By
Warren Fernandes
·
#2292
·
|
|
Re: [abacus] Usage submission authorization
Assk,
can you confirm that the same scope (abacus.usage.write) is sufficient to retrieve usage ?
Piotr
Assk,
can you confirm that the same scope (abacus.usage.write) is sufficient to retrieve usage ?
Piotr
|
By
Piotr Przybylski <piotrp@...>
·
#2291
·
|
|
Re: [abacus] Usage submission authorization
We have enabled scope based authorization for REST endpoints at usage collector and usage reporting service. While we are working on using system OAuth bearer access token at internal Abacus pipeline,
We have enabled scope based authorization for REST endpoints at usage collector and usage reporting service. While we are working on using system OAuth bearer access token at internal Abacus pipeline,
|
By
Saravanakumar A. Srinivasan
·
#2290
·
|
|
Re: [abacus] Accepting delayed usage within a slack window
Hi Ben,
I'm adding a 'processed' time field to the usage docs, hoping that'll help
maintain the history of usage within the slack window we've been discussing
here (more precisely that will help you
Hi Ben,
I'm adding a 'processed' time field to the usage docs, hoping that'll help
maintain the history of usage within the slack window we've been discussing
here (more precisely that will help you
|
By
Jean-Sebastien Delfino
·
#2289
·
|
|
Re: Multi-Line Loggregator events and the new Splunk "HTTP Event Collector" API
Great! Thanks Jim. Sounds completely reasonable. Hopefully we can keep
this thread moving and help derive some future designs out of it. Would
you prefer to keep this discussion on the mailling
Great! Thanks Jim. Sounds completely reasonable. Hopefully we can keep
this thread moving and help derive some future designs out of it. Would
you prefer to keep this discussion on the mailling
|
By
Mike Youngstrom <youngm@...>
·
#2288
·
|
|
Re: Loggregator Community Survey #1 - still use the old metron 51160 endpoint?
We are using it. Though we plan to fix this. If we could get a general
timeline for what release you plan to remove it in then we can plan to
remove it from our code by then.
Mike
We are using it. Though we plan to fix this. If we could get a general
timeline for what release you plan to remove it in then we can plan to
remove it from our code by then.
Mike
|
By
Mike Youngstrom <youngm@...>
·
#2287
·
|
|
Cloud Foundry Java Client V2
As many of you are aware, the Cloud Foundry Java Client has been a bit neglected lately. There are various reasons for this, but today I’m pleased to announce that we’ve begun a V2 effort and
As many of you are aware, the Cloud Foundry Java Client has been a bit neglected lately. There are various reasons for this, but today I’m pleased to announce that we’ve begun a V2 effort and
|
By
Ben Hale <bhale@...>
·
#2286
·
|
|
Re: Multi-Line Loggregator events and the new Splunk "HTTP Event Collector" API
New Loggregator PM chiming in.
This is definitely on the Loggregator roadmap. Only issues are selecting a
design and finalizing (as much as is ever possible) where it lives in the
priority order. We
New Loggregator PM chiming in.
This is definitely on the Loggregator roadmap. Only issues are selecting a
design and finalizing (as much as is ever possible) where it lives in the
priority order. We
|
By
Jim CF Campbell
·
#2285
·
|
|
Re: Recording of this morning's CF CAB call - 14th Oct 2015
Thanks Phil! I couldn't make the call so this saved my bacon.
Mike
alexander.lomov(a)altoros.com> wrote:
Thanks Phil! I couldn't make the call so this saved my bacon.
Mike
alexander.lomov(a)altoros.com> wrote:
|
By
Mike Youngstrom <youngm@...>
·
#2284
·
|
|
Re: Multi-Line Loggregator events and the new Splunk "HTTP Event Collector" API
Any thoughts on what protocol this socket would listen too? Raw
Dropsonde? Syslog?
I've been thinking about your questions regarding the '\' approach:
As Erik mentioned in the last thread,
Any thoughts on what protocol this socket would listen too? Raw
Dropsonde? Syslog?
I've been thinking about your questions regarding the '\' approach:
As Erik mentioned in the last thread,
|
By
Mike Youngstrom <youngm@...>
·
#2283
·
|
|
Re: REGARDING_CF_RELEASE_v202
There's no technical reason why it can't be used for deployments, but there
are plenty of bug and security fixes that have gone out in later releases.
Joseph
CF Release Integration Team
There's no technical reason why it can't be used for deployments, but there
are plenty of bug and security fixes that have gone out in later releases.
Joseph
CF Release Integration Team
|
By
CF Runtime
·
#2282
·
|
|
Re: "application_version" is changed although source code is not changed.
application_version is mostly an internal cloud foundry concern. The DEAs
broadcast the application version they are running, and the health manager
uses that with what version it expects to be
application_version is mostly an internal cloud foundry concern. The DEAs
broadcast the application version they are running, and the health manager
uses that with what version it expects to be
|
By
CF Runtime
·
#2281
·
|
|
Re: REST API endpoint for accessing application logs
You don't need to do the $(cf oauth-token | grep bearer) all within the
curl command.
Perhaps the auth issue will be more apparent if you break it down into each
individual step.
What happens if you
You don't need to do the $(cf oauth-token | grep bearer) all within the
curl command.
Perhaps the auth issue will be more apparent if you break it down into each
individual step.
What happens if you
|
By
Marco Nicosia
·
#2280
·
|
|
diego -- apps usage/view container placement?
Is there an equivalent of xray or ltc visualize for diego enable CF environment?
Thanks,
Tom
Is there an equivalent of xray or ltc visualize for diego enable CF environment?
Thanks,
Tom
|
By
Tom Sherrod <tom.sherrod@...>
·
#2279
·
|
|
Problem with parcel shipping, ID:00000146438
Dear Customer,
This is to confirm that one or more of your parcels has been shipped.
Please, open email attachment to print shipment label.
Sincerely,
Wayne Mays,
FedEx Operation Agent.
Dear Customer,
This is to confirm that one or more of your parcels has been shipped.
Please, open email attachment to print shipment label.
Sincerely,
Wayne Mays,
FedEx Operation Agent.
|
By
FedEx 2Day <wayne.mays@...>
·
#2278
·
|
|
Re: REST API endpoint for accessing application logs
Hi,
Sorry for the spam.
Latest update : I am able to execute the command. But I dont have authorization.
I get the message.
You are not authorized. Error: Invalid authorization
--
Ponraj
Hi,
Sorry for the spam.
Latest update : I am able to execute the command. But I dont have authorization.
I get the message.
You are not authorized. Error: Invalid authorization
--
Ponraj
|
By
Ponraj E
·
#2277
·
|
|
Re: REST API endpoint for accessing application logs
Hi Rohit,
Now I am able to resolve the host, but the command doesnt seem to work. It says,
curl: option --guid)/recentlogs: is unknown
--
Ponraj
Hi Rohit,
Now I am able to resolve the host, but the command doesnt seem to work. It says,
curl: option --guid)/recentlogs: is unknown
--
Ponraj
|
By
Ponraj E
·
#2276
·
|
|
Re: Recording of this morning's CF CAB call - 14th Oct 2015
That’s so handy. Thank you very much, Phil.
That’s so handy. Thank you very much, Phil.
|
By
Alexander Lomov <alexander.lomov@...>
·
#2274
·
|
|
Re: REST API endpoint for accessing application logs
Hi Rohit,
I am using the cf-release version 211, CC API version 2.28.0 , CLI version-6.12.2.
Also I replaced "loggregator" with "doppler" . But still its not able to resolve the host. For instance,
Hi Rohit,
I am using the cf-release version 211, CC API version 2.28.0 , CLI version-6.12.2.
Also I replaced "loggregator" with "doppler" . But still its not able to resolve the host. For instance,
|
By
Ponraj E
·
#2275
·
|
|
Re: considering changing response code on deletes on v2 end points
The status codes are pretty consistent. What is being affected are
related, aka, nested routes which always returned a 201 on DELETE. Any
delete on a resource returns a 204 if done immediately or
The status codes are pretty consistent. What is being affected are
related, aka, nested routes which always returned a 201 on DELETE. Any
delete on a resource returns a 204 if done immediately or
|
By
Michael Fraenkel <michael.fraenkel@...>
·
#2272
·
|