Thanks James they need to send app-to-app through gorouter Do you have a sample that I checkout? I've never directly worked with gorouter

also note that there is work to support adding service brokers scoped to a space. this api [1] is currently marked experimental but the release marker for "private brokers" is not ready yet [2].

bosh-lite shouldn't be too bad if you have access to a server with enough memory: https://github.com/cloudfoundry/bosh-lite/blob/master/bin/provision_cf most of the cf team uses that. i haven't tried

app instances in cloud foundry are currently not allowed to route directly to other app instances. they need to send app-to-app through gorouter, which often also has a load balancer in front of

One of the things that need to be supported in abacus is the handling of delayed usage submissions within a particular slack window after the usage has happened. For example, given a slack window of

Hi, I understand that gorouter performs the task of a reverse proxy. However, I'll like to know if it's possible to have an app that performs the task of a reverse proxy for other apps (something

Ronak, I have checked the Local machine too, it shows the following, [root(a)opencf microbosh]# df -H Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted

Check "df -h" on your local system from where you are uploading the release.

Hi All, When am uploading the Cloud Foundry Release v202 to the Director, its throwing the following error. bosh upload release /root/tmp/cf-release-202.tgz Acting as user 'admin' on

Now that we have secured Abacus using OAuth bearer access token based authentication (See [1] for more details), we need to have an end-end test coverage that tests Abacus with security enabled at

Hi, I'm developing a sample CF service and I do not have access to CF deployment to test it. Any suggestion ? Please suggest me some simple & easy deployment .. Thanks, Vinod

Org and Service Instance guids are generated by the Cloud Controller. It simply uses the SecureRandom.uuid ruby

Hey Piotr, each resource id e.g. short lived resources. you have in mind? version, usage of which may be reported and metered but not necessarily billed. OK, that use case makes sense to me. So,

Thank you. I will check the github thread.

usage to an intermediate step in the pipeline. That's a great point, had not thought about that... So now with that we'll have a clear delineation between usage submission from a resource

OK great. I've been looking into our database partitioning to fix issue #69 [1] (related to this discussion as well) earlier this week so I'll go ahead and make that simple change then. [1]

> So, I'm wondering if it still makes sense to use the resource provider's token inside our *asynchronous* usage *processing* pipeline. Shouldn't we require the individual processing steps to obtain

Yes, I think your proposal makes sense. I would prefer that approach rather than what I've detailed above with retrieving everything within a potential 2-year timeframe to fit purposes that the user

Hi all, Could somebody from the CF team point me to the CF code that generates org and service instance guids? Are the generated guids globally unique across multiple deployments/instances of CF? or

Another possible idea. Allow an application to send a single log line with the new line characters escaped "Some Log Line1\\nSome Log Line2" Then Loggregator could either remove the escape on the