the cf oss wiki [1] has a design docs section [2] that lists an approach called "placement pools" [3]. the placement pools concept never moved beyond the proposal phase and now that diego is the

Can Cloudfoundry place specific app on specific IaaS pool. Install many CF is not a elegant option. Can we support it as below? 1: install full cf-release 2: install DEA on specific IaaS, change the

On nabble, your question appears updated: http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/Multi-DEA-pool-in-cloudfoundry-td1674.html But in the emails that people have already received, and on the official cf-dev

Thanks Amit. The question is the same. I will update the question from PCF to CF -- View this message in context:

Hi, This is a mailing list for the open source Cloud Foundry project. Please use Pivotal's internal communication channels if your question is specifically related to PCF. Thanks, Amit

Many of customers asked for a feature that is they can place specific app on specific IaaS pool. Install many PCF is not a elegant option. Can we support it as below? 1: install full PCF 2: install

zongwei, i'm unclear why a single org with multiple spaces, each potentially with their own quota, which is what the cf system does today, does not satisfy the customer's request when using a single

Everything should still work as is. wrote:

I am glad for future simpler networking for bosh-lite manifests; I just know we have lots of infrastructure-warden.yml spiff templates in lots of bosh releases. Also, will bosh-lite stemcells keep

I know versioning is somewhat a lost cause for bosh-lite.  I guess my actual question is: will old manifests still work for new bosh-lite? I assume so as you said "you will not notice any

Perhaps worthy of a major version bump? wrote:

Hey all, As of version 9000.50.0 bosh-lite uses official garden-linux release. If everything was gone right, you will not notice any difference in how things work. One benefit of using newer garden

Bump, do you have any thoughts on my follow on questions below Erik? Mike

One idea is that Org will refer to itself and form a TREE structure. The most descendant Org instance in the hierarchy will have a Space instance. Any parent Org won't have Space. -Zongwei

CliCommandWithoutTerminalOutput is the function you're looking for. -- Matthew Sykes matthew.sykes(a)gmail.com

Benjamin, I think we are looking for a complete solution, which mostly likely will change data model, including object model of Org, Space, Role, Resource, Permission, User and etc. -Zongwei

hi, I am attempting to write a plugin for cf cli, and I want to get the users oauth token from the command 'oauth-token' without printing the token to the user's command line. Is there a way to do

zongwei, i think we are mixing problem and solution here. let's get very clear on exactly the desired user experience before jumping to what components need to change. if the data model remained the

I built all the components on my own and have them running on one VM, with config changed from the bosh defaults as needed (I had already had this working, but with an older CF version (203) and now

James, Thank you for your insights. How about using one single CF instance to build Org hierarchy which is similar to hierarchy structure of an organization - an CF Org could have multiple level of