|
Re: Overcommit on Diego Cells
Thanks for the response Eric. It was very helpful.
One last question. Any thoughts on what would be the best way to monitor
free ephemeral disk space in my overcommitted situation? If
Thanks for the response Eric. It was very helpful.
One last question. Any thoughts on what would be the best way to monitor
free ephemeral disk space in my overcommitted situation? If
|
By
Mike Youngstrom <youngm@...>
·
#1311
·
|
|
Re: Web proxy support in buildpacks
Thanks JT for your answer. Based on our experience, one of the best
practice to share is that it's a good idea to set all the below four
environment variables:
http_proxy, HTTP_PROXY, https_proxy,
Thanks JT for your answer. Based on our experience, one of the best
practice to share is that it's a good idea to set all the below four
environment variables:
http_proxy, HTTP_PROXY, https_proxy,
|
By
Jack Cai
·
#1310
·
|
|
Re: Update on Mailman 3 launch
We have a workaround in place for the above issue (hack code to disable connection pooling) and it seems to have addressed this problem until we can get a better fix.
We've also just filed a new bug
We have a workaround in place for the above issue (hack code to disable connection pooling) and it seems to have addressed this problem until we can get a better fix.
We've also just filed a new bug
|
By
Eric Searcy <eric@...>
·
#1309
·
|
|
Re: Running Docker private images on CF
Thanks for the details.
I deployed diego-docker-cache-release and I could run private docker images
now.
One note however. I had to modify the **property-overrides.yml *to add the
IP:<port> of the
Thanks for the details.
I deployed diego-docker-cache-release and I could run private docker images
now.
One note however. I had to modify the **property-overrides.yml *to add the
IP:<port> of the
|
By
dharmi
·
#1308
·
|
|
Re: I'm getting different x_forwarded_for in my Gorouter access logs depending on what browser/cli-tool I use.
What do you use for your edge load balancer?
You could try to set up your edge load balancer to strip x_forwarded_for
sent in the request and set it again before forwarding on.
In that way, I believe
What do you use for your edge load balancer?
You could try to set up your edge load balancer to strip x_forwarded_for
sent in the request and set it again before forwarding on.
In that way, I believe
|
By
Dieu Cao <dcao@...>
·
#1307
·
|
|
Re: Security Question --- Securely wipe data on warden container removal / destruction???
In the Docker image case, the filesystem layer specific to the container is
also deleted immediately when the container stops running (this is the same
for buildpack based apps on Diego/Garden). Lower
In the Docker image case, the filesystem layer specific to the container is
also deleted immediately when the container stops running (this is the same
for buildpack based apps on Diego/Garden). Lower
|
By
Will Pragnell <wpragnell@...>
·
#1306
·
|
|
Re: I'm getting different x_forwarded_for in my Gorouter access logs depending on what browser/cli-tool I use.
Gist of diff:
https://gist.github.com/simonjohansson/847e972f1459ea4cd65e
Gist of debug output:
https://gist.github.com/simonjohansson/3324b08fc42e5ac7105a
Since it's quite hard to read in the
Gist of diff:
https://gist.github.com/simonjohansson/847e972f1459ea4cd65e
Gist of debug output:
https://gist.github.com/simonjohansson/3324b08fc42e5ac7105a
Since it's quite hard to read in the
|
By
Simon Johansson <simon@...>
·
#1305
·
|
|
I'm getting different x_forwarded_for in my Gorouter access logs depending on what browser/cli-tool I use.
Hiya!
Im looking into an issue where the x_forwarded_for have different values depending on what you are using to hit it with.
With curl, w3m, lynx x_forwarded_for gets set to "sourceIP,
Hiya!
Im looking into an issue where the x_forwarded_for have different values depending on what you are using to hit it with.
With curl, w3m, lynx x_forwarded_for gets set to "sourceIP,
|
By
Simon Johansson <simon@...>
·
#1304
·
|
|
Re: Security Question --- Securely wipe data on warden container removal / destruction???
warden/DEAs keeps container file systems for a configured amount of time,
something like 1 hr before removing the containers, i believe with standard
removal tools.
diego cells and garden removes
warden/DEAs keeps container file systems for a configured amount of time,
something like 1 hr before removing the containers, i believe with standard
removal tools.
diego cells and garden removes
|
By
James Bayer
·
#1303
·
|
|
Re: More reliable way to collect user application logs
use the syslog nozzle to get system component logs and send them to your
syslog server of choice.
https://github.com/cloudfoundry-community/firehose-to-syslog
wrote:
--
Thank you,
James Bayer
use the syslog nozzle to get system component logs and send them to your
syslog server of choice.
https://github.com/cloudfoundry-community/firehose-to-syslog
wrote:
--
Thank you,
James Bayer
|
By
James Bayer
·
#1302
·
|
|
Re: CF integration with logging and monitoring tool
what is your logging and metrics tool? does it have an api?
the loggregator nozzle's are the go-forward approach to tapping into logs
and metrics in the entire cf system and sending them
what is your logging and metrics tool? does it have an api?
the loggregator nozzle's are the go-forward approach to tapping into logs
and metrics in the entire cf system and sending them
|
By
James Bayer
·
#1301
·
|
|
Re: Running Docker private images on CF
i don't believe the current docker support includes support for private
docker images on a docker registry that require authentication. that does
not seem to be listed in the diego docker docs [1]
i don't believe the current docker support includes support for private
docker images on a docker registry that require authentication. that does
not seem to be listed in the diego docker docs [1]
|
By
James Bayer
·
#1300
·
|
|
Re: Notifications for service provisioning
there is no standard notification mechanism built into cf today for this
kind of information. as an administrator, you could possibly potentially
build and deploy a loggregator firehose nozzle that
there is no standard notification mechanism built into cf today for this
kind of information. as an administrator, you could possibly potentially
build and deploy a loggregator firehose nozzle that
|
By
James Bayer
·
#1299
·
|
|
Re: Bizarre DEA + Spring Behaviour
here is some guidance on how to check for available entropy on a linux host
[1]. i'm not sure if the bosh agent, DEA or diego cell captures this metric
or not. but we should certainly look into it.
here is some guidance on how to check for available entropy on a linux host
[1]. i'm not sure if the bosh agent, DEA or diego cell captures this metric
or not. but we should certainly look into it.
|
By
James Bayer
·
#1298
·
|
|
Re: Bizarre DEA + Spring Behaviour
I've seen this happen to a good number of apps running on PWS, so it's
something you can encounter when running CF on AWS as well.
What usually happens is that the application takes significantly
I've seen this happen to a good number of apps running on PWS, so it's
something you can encounter when running CF on AWS as well.
What usually happens is that the application takes significantly
|
By
Daniel Mikusa
·
#1297
·
|
|
Re: Security group rules to allow HTTP communication between 2 apps deployed on CF
ahmadferdous(a)gmail.com> wrote:
How are you trying to connect to App1 from App2? If you access App2's URL,
it should work? i.e. app-2.your-cf-domain.com
For inbound traffic, the restriction is
ahmadferdous(a)gmail.com> wrote:
How are you trying to connect to App1 from App2? If you access App2's URL,
it should work? i.e. app-2.your-cf-domain.com
For inbound traffic, the restriction is
|
By
Daniel Mikusa
·
#1296
·
|
|
Re: no more stdout in app files since upgrade to 214
i use cf cli 6.12.2 (so the latest)
--
View this message in context: http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/no-more-stdout-in-app-files-since-upgrade-to-214-tp1197p1275.html
Sent from the CF Dev mailing
i use cf cli 6.12.2 (so the latest)
--
View this message in context: http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/no-more-stdout-in-app-files-since-upgrade-to-214-tp1197p1275.html
Sent from the CF Dev mailing
|
By
ramonskie
·
#1295
·
|
|
Security Question --- Securely wipe data on warden container removal / destruction???
Hi,
I have a few questions regarding the way data is removed when an application is removed and its corresponding warden container is destroyed. As the Cloud Foundry instance my company is using may
Hi,
I have a few questions regarding the way data is removed when an application is removed and its corresponding warden container is destroyed. As the Cloud Foundry instance my company is using may
|
By
Chris K
·
#1294
·
|
|
Re: More reliable way to collect user application logs
same query for the component logs
--
View this message in context: http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/cf-dev-More-reliable-way-to-collect-user-application-logs-tp1214p1273.html
Sent from the CF Dev
same query for the component logs
--
View this message in context: http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/cf-dev-More-reliable-way-to-collect-user-application-logs-tp1214p1273.html
Sent from the CF Dev
|
By
Ronak Banka
·
#1293
·
|
|
Re: Bizarre DEA + Spring Behaviour
Go for it and let's see if we can document this issue afterwards with some
logs for other people.
daniel.jones(a)engineerbetter.com> wrote:
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Johannes Hiemer
Go for it and let's see if we can document this issue afterwards with some
logs for other people.
daniel.jones(a)engineerbetter.com> wrote:
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Johannes Hiemer
|
By
Johannes Hiemer <jvhiemer@...>
·
#1292
·
|