|
Re: Buildpacks PMC - 2015-05-04 Notes
Glad to see that the static and null buildpacks will be shipping with
cf-release soon.
Chris Sterling
chris.sterling(a)gmail.com
twitter: @csterwa
linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/chrissterling
Glad to see that the static and null buildpacks will be shipping with
cf-release soon.
Chris Sterling
chris.sterling(a)gmail.com
twitter: @csterwa
linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/chrissterling
|
By
Chris Sterling
·
#12
·
|
|
Re: Buildpacks PMC - 2015-05-04 Notes
The biggest issue with GDrive is that our folks in China can’t easily view them ;)
My question/feedback comes from the other recent thread about buildpack sizing and efficiency. I did not see a
The biggest issue with GDrive is that our folks in China can’t easily view them ;)
My question/feedback comes from the other recent thread about buildpack sizing and efficiency. I did not see a
|
By
Wayne E. Seguin
·
#11
·
|
|
Re: Addressing buildpack size
Because of very good compatibility between versions (post 1.X) I would like to make a motion to do the following:
Split the buildpack:
have the default golang buildpack track the latest golang
Because of very good compatibility between versions (post 1.X) I would like to make a motion to do the following:
Split the buildpack:
have the default golang buildpack track the latest golang
|
By
Wayne E. Seguin
·
#13
·
|
|
Buildpacks PMC - 2015-05-04 Notes
Hi all,
We held the first Buildpacks PMC meeting today; I'd like to share the
agenda and notes.
For reference, all agendas notes for the Buildpacks PMC will be kept in a
public Google Drive folder
Hi all,
We held the first Buildpacks PMC meeting today; I'd like to share the
agenda and notes.
For reference, all agendas notes for the Buildpacks PMC will be kept in a
public Google Drive folder
|
By
Mike Dalessio
·
#10
·
|
|
Re: Addressing buildpack size
the go community tends to move fast to adopt the latest versions of go. i
imagine we can drop 1.1 and 1.2 without impacting most people.
anyone on the list experience otherwise?
onsi
the go community tends to move fast to adopt the latest versions of go. i
imagine we can drop 1.1 and 1.2 without impacting most people.
anyone on the list experience otherwise?
onsi
|
By
Onsi Fakhouri <ofakhouri@...>
·
#9
·
|
|
Re: Addressing buildpack size
Hi Wayne,
wayneeseguin(a)starkandwayne.com> wrote:
Thanks for asking this question.
Currently we're including the following binary dependencies in
`go-buildpack`:
```
cache $ ls -lSh
Hi Wayne,
wayneeseguin(a)starkandwayne.com> wrote:
Thanks for asking this question.
Currently we're including the following binary dependencies in
`go-buildpack`:
```
cache $ ls -lSh
|
By
Mike Dalessio
·
#8
·
|
|
Re: Addressing buildpack size
What an incredible step in the right direction, Awesome!!!
Out of curiosity, why is the go buildpack still quite so large?
What an incredible step in the right direction, Awesome!!!
Out of curiosity, why is the go buildpack still quite so large?
|
By
Wayne E. Seguin
·
#7
·
|
|
Addressing buildpack size
Skinny buildpacks have been cut for go, nodejs, php, python and ruby
buildpacks.
| | current | previous |
|--------+---------+----------|
| go | 442MB | 633MB |
| nodejs | 69MB |
Skinny buildpacks have been cut for go, nodejs, php, python and ruby
buildpacks.
| | current | previous |
|--------+---------+----------|
| go | 442MB | 633MB |
| nodejs | 69MB |
|
By
Mike Dalessio
·
#6
·
|
|
Re: Linking to individual threads?
+1 - I miss the link at the bottom too.
Dan
+1 - I miss the link at the bottom too.
Dan
|
By
Daniel Mikusa
·
#5
·
|
|
Re: Linking to individual threads?
there is, but it would be nicer if the link appeared in the email
http://lists.cloudfoundry.org/pipermail/cf-dev/2015-April/000002.html
wrote:
there is, but it would be nicer if the link appeared in the email
http://lists.cloudfoundry.org/pipermail/cf-dev/2015-April/000002.html
wrote:
|
By
Filip Hanik
·
#4
·
|
|
Linking to individual threads?
Is there a way to link to individual email threads with the new mailing
list format?
Thanks!
Quinn
Is there a way to link to individual email threads with the new mailing
list format?
Thanks!
Quinn
|
By
Quintessence Anx
·
#3
·
|
|
Re: [vcap-dev] Java OOM debugging
Hi,
I created a few tools to debug OOM problems since the application I was
responsible for running on CF was failing constantly because of OOM
problems. The problems I had, turned out not to be
Hi,
I created a few tools to debug OOM problems since the application I was
responsible for running on CF was failing constantly because of OOM
problems. The problems I had, turned out not to be
|
By
Lari Hotari <Lari@...>
·
#2
·
|
|
Re: [vcap-dev] Java OOM debugging
Dave,
I've found using SSH tunnels can make debugging the JVM easier. I haven't
tried using Yourkit via a tunnel, but I suspect it would work. Maybe worth
a try. Some more details on setting up
Dave,
I've found using SSH tunnels can make debugging the JVM easier. I haven't
tried using Yourkit via a tunnel, but I suspect it would work. Maybe worth
a try. Some more details on setting up
|
By
Daniel Mikusa
·
#1
·
|