Re: Eirini in 2019 CFAR certification requirements


Julz Friedman
 

> That phrasing doesn't read as a component I would want to run in production (or in a certified distribution).

Oops! You’re quite right Matt, this is still the README from my original spike many months ago, before we even officially started the project — we’ll be sure to update that asap :-).

In the mean time, fwiw, there’s a (very) long and detailed proposal document, from when we originally approved Eirini as an incubator project, with much much more detail about the reasoning available here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qs6UQQDWMkfOpY19XqS3CfvI00jCns876TjplJ6E95s/edit?ouid=109489329491803931461&usp=docs_home&ths=true

Thanks!


On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 18:37, Matt Cholick <cholick@...> wrote:
The eirini repository's current README (https://github.com/cloudfoundry-incubator/eirini#y-tho-y) states: "Partly a fun experiment, partly a proof of concept"

That phrasing doesn't read as a component I would want to run in production (or in a certified distribution).

That section doesn't really dive into strong detail as to "why" the project important either. I think fleshing that section out more would be valuable.

-Matt


On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 8:13 AM Chip Childers <cchilders@...> wrote:
On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 5:03 AM Krannich, Bernd <bernd.krannich@...> wrote:
  • If I am not getting things wrong this means that distributions could be certified with only running Diego well before the Diego GA.
This is an accurate statement.
 

[1] Feedback: For governance docs (@Chip Childers), it might be worthwhile to keep things in a public Github repo, too.


Ack - will work on that. :) 

Join cf-dev@lists.cloudfoundry.org to automatically receive all group messages.