Hi Jeff,
cool stuff. Good to here you bring in that aspect into the community. For
me that sounds like the nearly same pattern as with bosh, we talked about
at OS Summit in Boston. There are some points in the Cloud Foundry platform
where it is to strong coupled to a special workflow. So your input and even
more the open discussion you started seems more than beneficial for the
ecosystem to me. Will definitely have a look at it and leave my comments in
the document.
Greets
Christian
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Tue, 23 May 2017 at 08:07 Krannich, Bernd <bernd.krannich(a)sap.com> wrote:
Hi Jeff,
This is indeed exciting. With our large set of on prem software
installations running on more “Enterprisy” Linux distros offering a SUSE
stemcell opens up a couple of opportunities. While I can’t promise that
we’ll actually use this option it’s a prerequisite for us to have a major
vendor like SUSE behind such an effort to even start discussing.
In the past, we have seen some “no-nos” in major BOSH releases (like
installing a Debian package for the single VM Postgres in cf-release [I
know, I know, single VM Postgres’es are anyhow considered development
only]). I hope this move and the testing you are suggesting encourages
people to look into alternatives of getting their software deployed inside
a BOSH release.
Regards,
Bernd
P.S.: Needless to say, we are anyhow working very closely with you guys in
the context of the joint OpenStack CPI work and related Dojo. So, there
will be opportunities to further discuss the topic.
*Bernd Krannich*
SAP Cloud Platform
*SAP SE*
Dietmar-Hopp-Allee 16, 69190 Walldorf, Germany
E bernd.krannich(a)sap.com
Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statement: www.sap.com/impressum
<http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx/>
Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Geschäftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige
vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrtümlich
erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine
Vervielfältigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdrücklich untersagt. Bitte
benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen
Dank.
This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or
otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in
error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of
it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the
original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation.
*From: *Chip Childers <cchilders(a)cloudfoundry.org>
*Reply-To: *"Discussions about Cloud Foundry projects and the system
overall." <cf-dev(a)lists.cloudfoundry.org>
*Date: *Monday, 22. May 2017 at 18:09
*To: *"Discussions about Cloud Foundry projects and the system overall." <
cf-dev(a)lists.cloudfoundry.org>
*Subject: *[cf-dev] Re: Proposal: Add support for SUSE stack and stemcells
Exciting stuff. In particular, getting an OS vendor involved in the
upstream seems like a really good move for the community overall. :)
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 12:02 PM Jeff Hobbs <jeff.hobbs(a)suse.com> wrote:
Hi CF devs,
SUSE would like to present a proposal to add support for SUSE Linux as a
stack and stemcell option, alongside the current Ubuntu base.
The intent is to allow SUSE Linux as a certified and supported variant,
but not replace Ubuntu. Much of this was already technically possible with
clean separations currently in place.
We have undergone a spike internally to determine feasibility, through to
fully working openSUSE stemcell and stack that passes CATs and BATs. We
have prepared a document[1] which discusses the intentions and the work
involved to get there.
We believe this can be supported in an ongoing manner and are willing to
provide the resources to do this. We have had an initial discussion with
Chip, Mike and Onsi to ensure the basic premise was workable and we’d done
enough initial experimentations. Now we wanted to present this proposed
idea for open discussion here.
The next steps are (1) this community discussion on the proposal and (2) a
follow-on spike with current upstream contributors who have experience over
the current CF build system and buildpacks to flesh out potential unknown
unknowns in supporting an alternative stack and stem.
Please feel free to give your thoughts in this thread and/or comment in
the attached document.
Regards,
Jeff Hobbs
Director, Engineering
SUSE Application Platforms
[1]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SpCt6e5hk4fpOSCYmhMJrxuR-yfZu-RKz1w8QyYg5YE/edit?usp=sharing
--
Chip Childers
CTO, Cloud Foundry Foundation
1.267.250.0815 <(267)%20250-0815>
--
E-Mail: cbrinker(a)evoila.de
evoila GmbH
Wilhelm-Theodor-Römheld-Str. 34
55130 Mainz
Germany
Geschäftsführer: Johannes Hiemer
Amtsgericht Mainz HRB 42719
Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte
Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail
irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und
vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte
Weitergabe dieser Mail ist nicht gestattet.
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If You
are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error)
please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any
unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this
e-mail is strictly forbidden.