Re: Proposal for named service bindings


Mike Youngstrom
 

Excellent. Thanks Zack!

Mike

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Zach Robinson <zrobinson(a)pivotal.io> wrote:

Hey Peter,

I like the use-case that this proposal allows developers to set their
expected service name at development time. I think this is a nice explicit
contract and is also portable between Foundations, where services may have
different names.

I prefer that we find a way to keep VCAP_SERVICES backwards compatible and
that we keep binding names optional.

I will try drop a doc off on this thread in a couple days with a proposal
based on yours and with some cli stuff vetted by the cli team. Then we can
look at getting work prioritized

-Zach
CAPI Project Lead

Join cf-dev@lists.cloudfoundry.org to automatically receive all group messages.