Re: SSH access to CF app instances on Diego
Jan Dubois <jand@...>
I would rather that scp would throw an error than having it copy the
file and then immediately kill the instance. I still don't understand
how that would ever be useful.
Or would having a simultaneous ssh session to the same container keep
it alive even after the scp session ended?
I have no problem with not allowing scp into app instances by default.
Cheers,
-Jan
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
file and then immediately kill the instance. I still don't understand
how that would ever be useful.
Or would having a simultaneous ssh session to the same container keep
it alive even after the scp session ended?
I have no problem with not allowing scp into app instances by default.
Cheers,
-Jan
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 6:05 PM, James Bayer <jbayer(a)pivotal.io> wrote:
you can turn the "restart tainted containers" feature off with configuration
if you are authorized to do so. then using scp to write files into a
container would be persisted for the lifetime of the container even after
the ssh session ends.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Jan Dubois <jand(a)activestate.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Eric Malm <emalm(a)pivotal.io> wrote:after executing a command, concluding anWhat is the purpose of being able to copy a file into an instance if
interactive session, or copying a file into an instance, that instance
will
be restarted.
the instance is restarted as soon as the file has been received?
Cheers,
-Jan
_______________________________________________
cf-dev mailing list
cf-dev(a)lists.cloudfoundry.org
https://lists.cloudfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/cf-dev
--
Thank you,
James Bayer
_______________________________________________
cf-dev mailing list
cf-dev(a)lists.cloudfoundry.org
https://lists.cloudfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/cf-dev