Re: Testing behaviour of a production CF environment
On 1 June 2016 at 09:22, Daniel Jones <daniel.jones(a)engineerbetter.com>
Running acceptance tests in production is absolutely what I'd recommend -Sounds very relevant, I'll look forward to the video.
I've worked with customers who didn't use the official CATS, but insteadWe have added tests for things we've built / configured, we borrowed a fair
amount in style from CATS:
In principle I think the conversations / decisions about which behaviour
should be tested is valuable, as is having tests written in a language /
framework that's understood by the team, so I can understand why people
would do this.
I don't think this works for us for things that are already tested in CATS
though, as it feels like duplication of effort, both to write and maintain
the tests, which is why I'm interested in the idea of moving tests around
within CATS to enable people to run a subset of tests that we consider to