Re: [cf-env] [abacus] Changing how resources are organized
Piotr Przybylski <piotrp@...>
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
The main aggregation needed is at the resource type, however the aggregation within consumer by the resource Id is also something we would like to access - for example to determine that application used two different version of node. Instead of introducing resource type, the alternative approach could be to augment the consumer id with the resource id.
-----Jean-Sebastien Delfino <jsdelfino@...> wrote: -----
To: "Discussions about Cloud Foundry projects and the system overall." <cf-dev@...>
From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino <jsdelfino@...>
Date: 12/09/2015 11:51AM
Subject: [cf-dev] Re: Re: Re: [cf-env] [abacus] Changing how resources are organized
It depends if you still want usage aggregation at both the resource_id and resource_type_id levels (more changes as that'll add another aggregation level to the reports) or if you only need aggregation at the resource_type_id level (and are effectively treating that resource_type_id as a 'more convenient' resource_id).
What aggregation levels do you need, both, or just aggregation at that resource_type_id level?
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 3:19 PM, dmangin <dmangin@...> wrote:
Yes, this is related to github issue 38.