Re: [cf-env] [abacus] Changing how resources are organized


Jean-Sebastien Delfino
 

It depends if you still want usage aggregation at both the resource_id and
resource_type_id levels (more changes as that'll add another aggregation
level to the reports) or if you only need aggregation at the
resource_type_id level (and are effectively treating that resource_type_id
as a 'more convenient' resource_id).

What aggregation levels do you need, both, or just aggregation at that
resource_type_id level?

- Jean-Sebastien

On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 3:19 PM, dmangin <dmangin(a)us.ibm.com> wrote:

Yes, this is related to github issue 38.

https://github.com/cloudfoundry-incubator/cf-abacus/issues/38

We want to group the buildpacks by a resource_type_id and bind resource
definitions to the resource_type_id rather than to the resource_id.
However,
when we make this change, how will this affect how abacus is doing all of
the calculations. The only change that I can think of is for abacus to use
the resource_type_id rather than the resource_id when creating the reports.





--
View this message in context:
http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/cf-dev-abacus-Changing-how-resources-are-organized-tp2971p2991.html
Sent from the CF Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Join {cf-dev@lists.cloudfoundry.org to automatically receive all group messages.