Re: Buildpacks PMC - 2015-10-12 Notes
Mike Dalessio
Hello Guillaume,
Thanks for asking these questions! On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:32 AM, Guillaume Berche <bercheg(a)gmail.com> wrote: Hi Mike,We're having some discussions now as to next steps. Ideally I'd like to identify a track of feature work that will drive out a set of features for extending the buildpack staging lifecycle. If you or anyone else has suggestions, I'm all ears. No reason it couldn't support an ordered set of buildpacks. I'm not fully convinced this is the best way to proceed, but it's certainly the easiest, and we're looking at it pretty hard at this point. This experiment was cut short, as the "web hook" model introduced too many reliability concerns, in my opinion, especially around relying on external services to stage an app. I'm open to revisiting it in the future, but would like to try more pedestrian solutions first. Absolutely, I will do so soon.
|
|