Re: [abacus] Accepting delayed usage within a slack window
The benefit in having the year window allows only having to go to asingle database as opposed to a potential 12 databases with month windows
Correct, if your resource instance has incurred usage in the last month,
but if no usage has been submitted for a resource instance since Jan for
example, then we still need to run a descending query back to Jan, giving
us a max of 12 database partitions to scan for old/inactive resource
instances when we do that in Dec (which is typically when people start to
get more interested in their yearly usage.)
but I think that probably doesn't outweigh having to duplicate the yearlydata on every document.
+1, that's what I was thinking.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Benjamin Cheng <bscheng(a)us.ibm.com> wrote:
I'm leaning towards agreeing with you in terms of reducing the number of