Thanks Atul and Marco for your advice.

Below is the command I used to push the docker image:

* ltc create hello <docker-image> --ports 8888,8788 --http-routes
hello:8888 --tcp-routes 8788:8788 --memory-mb=0 --timeout=10m
--monitor-port=8888*

After the push completed, it reported below:





*...hello is now running.App is reachable at:192.168.11.11.xip.io:8788
<http://192.168.11.11.xip.io:8788>http://hello.192.168.11.11.xip.io
<http://hello.192.168.11.11.xip.io>*

I also tried to update the routes:


* ltc update hello --http-routes hello:8888 --tcp-routes 8788:8788*
If I do "ltc status hello", I see the below routes:








*Instances 1/1Start Timeout 0DiskMB 0MemoryMB
0CPUWeight 100Ports 8788,8888Routes
192.168.11.11.xip.io:8788 <http://192.168.11.11.xip.io:8788> =>
8788 hello.192.168.11.11.xip.io
<http://hello.192.168.11.11.xip.io> => 8888*

But when I visited http://192.168.11.11.xip.io:8788/, I got "Unable to
connect", while I could visit http://hello.192.168.11.11.xip.io/
successfully.

Below is the log I saw when doing "vagrant up" to bring up Lattice:



















*...==> default: stdin: is not a tty==> default: mkdir: created directory
â/var/latticeâ==> default: mkdir: created directory â/var/lattice/setupâ==>
default: Running provisioner: shell... default: Running: inline
script==> default: stdin: is not a tty==> default: * Stopping web server
lighttpd==> default: ...done.==> default: Installing cflinuxfs2
rootfs...==> default: done==> default: * Starting web server lighttpd==>
default: ...done.==> default: Installing Lattice (v0.4.0) (Diego
0.1398.0) - Brain==> default: Finished Installing Lattice Brain (v0.4.0)
(Diego 0.1398.0)!==> default: Installing Lattice (v0.4.0) (Diego 0.1398.0)
- Lattice Cell==> default: Finished Installing Lattice Cell (v0.4.0) (Diego
0.1398.0)!==> default: bootstrap start/running==> default: Lattice is now
installed and running.==> default: You may target it using: ltc target
192.168.11.11.xip.io <http://192.168.11.11.xip.io>*

There is an error "stdin: is not a tty", and I don't see haproxy mentioned
in the log. Maybe haproxy is not started at all?

Jack