1. Cf-Dev
  2. Messages

Re: Placement Pools

James Bayer
 

we've been using a new term for the same concept we've previously labeled
placement pools called "isolation groups".

onsi has been working on some documentation for what this may look like and
the requirements, but the work has not started. i believe onsi will share
something soon.

so today, the way to accomplish this need to place apps on specific
infrastructure is to use separate CF installations.

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Matt Cholick <cholick(a)gmail.com> wrote:

More than a year ago, there was some discussion and a proposal around
adding placement pools so cloud foundry admins could better target how
applications were placed on runners:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GNjQwGBh0BvfAYpX0LTUYn6h4oLz7v4P9pNy0xHZtMw/edit#

Did this work gain traction? I've looked through the release notes as well
as MEGA and CF Diego's public trackers and don't see stories for this work
either done or planned, though it could also be that I'm just not finding
it.

My goal is to place canary apps in specifically Z1 or Z2, as well as place
some internally used apps that, for networking reasons, should be in one
zone or the other.

-Matt Cholick

--
Thank you,

James Bayer

?
attachment.html

Join {cf-dev@lists.cloudfoundry.org to automatically receive all group messages.