Hey all,

As of version 9000.50.0 bosh-lite uses official garden-linux release. If
everything was gone right, you will not notice any difference in how things
work.

One benefit of using newer garden server in bosh-lite is easier networking
configuration in your bosh-lite manifests.

For example before you would do something like this:

networks:
- name: cf1
subnets:
- cloud_properties: {name: random}
range: 10.244.0.0/30
reserved:
- 10.244.0.1
static:
- 10.244.0.2
- cloud_properties: {name: random}
range: 10.244.0.4/30
reserved:
- 10.244.0.5
static:
- 10.244.0.6
...

and now you can just do something like this since garden server allows to
place multiple containers on the same subnet:

networks:
- name: cf1
subnets:
- range: 10.244.0.0/24
gateway: 10.244.0.1
static: [10.244.0.2, 10.244.0.3]
...

Dmitriy

Perhaps worthy of a major version bump?

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Dmitriy Kalinin <dkalinin(a)pivotal.io>
wrote:

Hey all,
As of version 9000.50.0 bosh-lite uses official garden-linux release. If
everything was gone right, you will not notice any difference in how things
work.
One benefit of using newer garden server in bosh-lite is easier networking
configuration in your bosh-lite manifests.
For example before you would do something like this:
networks:
- name: cf1
subnets:
- cloud_properties: {name: random}
range: 10.244.0.0/30
reserved:
- 10.244.0.1
static:
- 10.244.0.2
- cloud_properties: {name: random}
range: 10.244.0.4/30
reserved:
- 10.244.0.5
static:
- 10.244.0.6
...
and now you can just do something like this since garden server allows to
place multiple containers on the same subnet:
networks:
- name: cf1
subnets:
- range: 10.244.0.0/24
gateway: 10.244.0.1
static: [10.244.0.2, 10.244.0.3]
...
Dmitriy

I know versioning is somewhat a lost cause for bosh-lite. 




I guess my actual question is: will old manifests still work for new bosh-lite? I assume so as you said "you will not notice any difference"

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Dmitriy Kalinin <dkalinin(a)pivotal.io>
wrote:

Hey all,
As of version 9000.50.0 bosh-lite uses official garden-linux release. If
everything was gone right, you will not notice any difference in how things
work.
One benefit of using newer garden server in bosh-lite is easier networking
configuration in your bosh-lite manifests.
For example before you would do something like this:
networks:
- name: cf1
subnets:
- cloud_properties: {name: random}
range: 10.244.0.0/30
reserved:
- 10.244.0.1
static:
- 10.244.0.2
- cloud_properties: {name: random}
range: 10.244.0.4/30
reserved:
- 10.244.0.5
static:
- 10.244.0.6
...
and now you can just do something like this since garden server allows to
place multiple containers on the same subnet:
networks:
- name: cf1
subnets:
- range: 10.244.0.0/24
gateway: 10.244.0.1
static: [10.244.0.2, 10.244.0.3]
...
Dmitriy

I am glad for future simpler networking for bosh-lite manifests; I just know we have lots of infrastructure-warden.yml spiff templates in lots of bosh releases.




Also, will bosh-lite stemcells keep *warden* in their name? I assume there's no functional difference; they are just rootfs.




There's probably automation around that looks for if the current stemcell name has been uploaded already; else tries to upload it.

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Dmitriy Kalinin <dkalinin(a)pivotal.io>
wrote:

Hey all,
As of version 9000.50.0 bosh-lite uses official garden-linux release. If
everything was gone right, you will not notice any difference in how things
work.
One benefit of using newer garden server in bosh-lite is easier networking
configuration in your bosh-lite manifests.
For example before you would do something like this:
networks:
- name: cf1
subnets:
- cloud_properties: {name: random}
range: 10.244.0.0/30
reserved:
- 10.244.0.1
static:
- 10.244.0.2
- cloud_properties: {name: random}
range: 10.244.0.4/30
reserved:
- 10.244.0.5
static:
- 10.244.0.6
...
and now you can just do something like this since garden server allows to
place multiple containers on the same subnet:
networks:
- name: cf1
subnets:
- range: 10.244.0.0/24
gateway: 10.244.0.1
static: [10.244.0.2, 10.244.0.3]
...
Dmitriy

Everything should still work as is.

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Dr Nic Williams <drnicwilliams(a)gmail.com>
wrote:

I am glad for future simpler networking for bosh-lite manifests; I just
know we have lots of infrastructure-warden.yml spiff templates in lots of
bosh releases.

Also, will bosh-lite stemcells keep *warden* in their name? I assume
there's no functional difference; they are just rootfs.

There's probably automation around that looks for if the current stemcell
name has been uploaded already; else tries to upload it.





On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Dmitriy Kalinin <dkalinin(a)pivotal.io>
wrote:

Hey all,

As of version 9000.50.0 bosh-lite uses official garden-linux release. If
everything was gone right, you will not notice any difference in how things
work.

One benefit of using newer garden server in bosh-lite is easier
networking configuration in your bosh-lite manifests.

For example before you would do something like this:

networks:
- name: cf1
subnets:
- cloud_properties: {name: random}
range: 10.244.0.0/30
reserved:
- 10.244.0.1
static:
- 10.244.0.2
- cloud_properties: {name: random}
range: 10.244.0.4/30
reserved:
- 10.244.0.5
static:
- 10.244.0.6
...

and now you can just do something like this since garden server allows to
place multiple containers on the same subnet:

networks:
- name: cf1
subnets:
- range: 10.244.0.0/24
gateway: 10.244.0.1
static: [10.244.0.2, 10.244.0.3]
...

Dmitriy

I'm having some difficulty with the new networking configuration.
I've defined a 'default' network as follows:

networks:
- name: default
subnets:
- range: 10.244.11.0/24
gateway: 10.244.11.1
static: [10.244.11.2]

And have assigned the static IP '10.244.11.2' to one of my jobs:

jobs:
- name: graphite
...
networks:
- name: default
static_ips:
- 10.244.11.2

However when I try to deploy I get the following error:

"Error 130009: `graphite/0' asked for a static IP 10.244.11.2 but it's in the dynamic pool"

Am I missing something? Testing this with bosh-lite 9000.50.0.