Hi, using a UID 900 will build you the stemcell, but it won't work correctly. The VCAP user home on the stemcell will have the wrong owner and you won't be able to deploy anything succesfully with it.

As I said: It is not so much about which way is better, it is more about having less things to think about. With the right arguments you might be able to convince the MEGA team to accept a PR to log i

Thanks, that looks like some really nice changes included there! One thing I'm not so sure about is how stdout and stderr are redirected to the same file now. Shouldn't we try to harmonize this someho

Dear Dimuthu, please make sure that your OpenStack environment is configured correctly and that you can access any machine booted up with a floating IP from your machine. You can follow the descriptio

Dear Dimuthu, bosh micro is deprecated. If you are starting out with a fresh installation of bosh, please use bosh-init [1] instead. That being said, if you want to continue the path for `bosh micro`:

Hi all, in case you use bosh on OpenStack you might want to use the Keystone v3 API which introduces Domains. I’m happy to announce that you can use Keystone v3 with bosh >=v218 and openstack-cpi >=v1

In case you have been following this discussion: security group definitions in the cloud_properties of resource pools available in the openstack-cpi-release v16 https://github.com/cloudfoundry-incubat

Supposedly something like this should work: http://bosh.io/docs/vm-anti-affinity.html#openstack This involves in configuring server groups with anti-affinity enabled on Openstack before actually deplo

Dear Fabian, your problem might be the same as seen in this github issue: https://github.com/cloudfoundry/bosh/issues/964<https://github.com/cloudfoundry/bosh/issues/964#event-420594944> `bosh ssh` se

Hi Dies, I agree that the registration at an external ELB would be very helpful to have – just like it is done for AWS. We currently use the HAProxy, so I guess this is a challenge which will hit us a

Dear Dmitriy, thanks for the quick reply. See my response inline.

Dear Boshers, we currently encounter a problem which has been discussed briefly before on the list [1]: Adding security groups in resource pools should be possible. On a side note: we are dealing with