Re: Bosh AlibabaCloud CPI Certification has not been merged yet
"何贵民(箫竹)
HI Chip and Mukesh,
Currently, the PR https://github.com/cloudfoundry-incubator/bosh-cpi-certification/pull/15 and https://github.com/cloudfoundry/bosh-acceptance-tests/pull/40 have been merged and the issue https://github.com/cloudfoundry/bosh-linux-stemcell-builder/issues/98 also has been fixed. But, the issue https://github.com/cloudfoundry/bosh-linux-stemcell-builder/issues/97 is still in opened. At present, I have submitted a PR https://github.com/cloudfoundry/bosh-linux-stemcell-builder/pull/101 to fix the issue #97. After that, the test-stemcell-ubuntu-xenial can always be success. Now, the PR #101 has been submitted in 5 days ago, but there is no any reply on it, and its story https://www.pivotaltracker.com/n/projects/2238419/stories/168192167 is still in Unscheduled. Can you push it? Thanks in advance. Thanks and warm regards
Guimin, He |
|
Re: Bosh AlibabaCloud CPI release has not had community version yet
"何贵民(箫竹)
HI Chip and Mukesh,
At present, the bosh-deployment has supported alibaba cloud, but the alibaba cloud bosh cpi https://github.com/cloudfoundry-incubator/bosh-alicloud-cpi-release has not been published in the bosh.io. Is there any plan for it? Thanks in advance. Thanks and warm regards
Guimin, He |
|
Re: Docs Bosh for Alibaba Cloud CPI has not been merged yet
"何贵民(箫竹)
HI Chip and Mukesh,
At present, the bosh-deployment has supported alibaba cloud, but the docs-bosh PR https://github.com/cloudfoundry/docs-bosh/pull/667 has not been merged yet. Is there any progress on it? |
|
Re: [cf-ambassadors] Cloud Foundry Community Awards: Nominations close Aug 31
Swarna Podila <spodila@...>
Thank you everyone that has sent in nominations so far. Please note that the deadline is Aug 31, 11:59PM US Pacific. Please send your nominations before that. Thank you, Swarna. On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 13:46 Swarna Podila via Lists.Cloudfoundry.Org <spodila=cloudfoundry.org@...> wrote:
--
|
|
Cloud Foundry Community Awards: Nominations close Aug 31
Swarna Podila <spodila@...>
Hi Everyone, It is that time of Cloud Foundry Summits where I nudge you all to nominate yourself or your peers, your organization or a peer's organization for the Community Awards. The details are here: https://www.cloudfoundry.org/blog/seeking-nominations-for-community-awards-eu-summit-edition/ TL;DR: there are four categories:
Nominations close on Aug 31 11:59PM US Pacific and awards will be presented to the recipients on the keynote stage on Sep 11, 2019 in The Hague. Feel free to ping me directly if you have questions. -- Swarna Podila (she/her) Senior Director, Community | Cloud Foundry FoundationYou can read more about pronouns here, or please ask if you'd like to find out more. |
|
Re: Bosh AlibabaCloud light stemcell has not been imported to provide community version yet
"何贵民(箫竹)
HI Mukesh, Thanks a lot for your effort. Light stemcell is accepted is very important for us.
|
|
Re: Bosh AlibabaCloud light stemcell has not been imported to provide community version yet
Mukesh Gadiya
Story is accepted and I can see the alicloud light stemcells on bosh.io. Let me know if you need any other help. On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 7:03 PM <guimin.hgm@...> wrote: HI Mukesh, Thanks a lot for your effort. |
|
Re: BOSH OpenStack CPI: planned end of maintenance by end of 2019
Marco Voelz
Hi everyone, hi Daniel,
Thanks for the interest in the BOSH OpenStack CPI, I'm happy to give you some perspective on what we had been doing in the past and what the current status is.
* We've automated pretty much everything in terms of regular maintenance. This includes updates of the dependencies like rubygems [1], and consumption of the ruby-release in bosh packages [2]. We have automated the update of ruby-release itself, such that ruby, rubygems, etc are automatically updated. * All PRs are tested against the supported set of OpenStack APIs by using the cf-openstack-validator to run a base set of API interactions with OpenStack [3]. We're using OpenLab [4] to provide virtualized OpenStack environments for us. Adding a new one is only a few lines of yml [5] * New versions of bosh, a stemcell, or the cpi are automatically tested in a pipeline using BATs and e2e tests. While this pipeline currently runs against an SAP provided OpenStack, it is easy to set this up against a different OpenStack * There are very few issues open (currently 7 issues and 3 of those are feature requests) * There isn't really left-over work for now: Our backlog contains 37 open stories tagged with 'cpi' [6]. Quite a few are crossed out (we decided not to do them, but keep them for future reference to document decisions), or even about different CPIs like AWS and GCP. * The biggest pain point in the past have been fog-openstack and excon. Updates of these two libraries are always a gamble, they don't seem to be well-tested and introduced quite some annoyances over the last few years. One example is how the individual OpenStack projects adopted microversions in their APIs and how fog-openstack selects which version to use. More recently, this didn't have much impact – it mostly matters when you're trying to use functionality that isn't present below a certain microversion or has been removed starting from a version. * We have been trying to support the community with their OpenStack issues in #openstack and #bosh on CF Slack. Interrupts don't come on a daily basis, but there is a need for looking at community questions. * We tried to improve the ecosystem with projects like cf-openstack-validator [9], better OpenStack support in bbl [10], and .tf templates for OpenStack [11]. Also maintaining the OpenStack part of the docs on bosh.io
Overall, I guess the amount of work you would need to put into the OpenStack CPI depends on what you're trying to do with it. My guess is that a pair of engineers is sufficient to address some of the more recent feature requests and keep the system alive and healthy.
Let me know if you need more information to get a feeling for what it means to take over this work. I'm happy to talk about individual aspects some more, if it helps.
Warm regards Marco
[1] https://github.com/cloudfoundry/bosh-openstack-cpi-release/pull/212 [2] https://github.com/cloudfoundry/bosh-openstack-cpi-release/pull/207 [3] https://github.com/cloudfoundry/bosh-openstack-cpi-release/pull/212#issuecomment-518850649 [4] https://openlabtesting.org/ [6] https://www.pivotaltracker.com/n/projects/1456570/search?q=label%3A%22cpi%22 [7] https://github.com/cloudfoundry/bosh-openstack-cpi-release/issues/186 [8] https://github.com/cloudfoundry/bosh-openstack-cpi-release/issues/211 [9] https://github.com/cloudfoundry-incubator/cf-openstack-validator [10] https://github.com/cloudfoundry/bosh-bootloader/pull/431 [11] https://github.com/cloudfoundry-incubator/bosh-openstack-environment-templates
From: <cf-bosh@...> on behalf of Daniel Jones <daniel.jones@...>
Hi all,
I should imagine there must be enough very large consumers of the OpenStack CPI to make it commercially viable for a small team to be funded that could maintain it, were all said consumers to pull together and contribute what I should imagine would be a small sliver of their total CF expenditure.
If any OpenStack CPI users want to talk to EngineerBetter about funded development, we'd be happy to have that conversation as we're doing some similar EOL work for other CF projects.
Similarly, if our chums at Anynines, Altoros, S&W, GrapeUp, EVoila, GStack, Armakuni, Novatec or others want to work together on this, we'd be open to that. I can also imagine that some chunk of Pivotal's revenue depends on this CPI, so perhaps some of our teal friends might be interested too? It could be like one of those Marvel films (that I don't watch) where we all team up to vanquish the evil villain of abandoned software.
Marco - how many pairs were working on these streams of work, and do you have a feel for the balance of vital maintenance, tech debt, new features, and quality-of-life improvements in the backlog?
Regards, Daniel 'Deejay' Jones - CTO +44 (0)79 8000 9153 EngineerBetter Ltd - More than cloud platform specialists
On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 at 09:38, Marco Voelz <marco.voelz@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Bosh AlibabaCloud light stemcell has not been imported to provide community version yet
"何贵民(箫竹)
HI Mukesh, Thanks a lot for your effort.
HI Chip, can you help to accelerate the story https://www.pivotaltracker.com/n/projects/2238419/stories/167410186 ? It is really very very very important for us and it have blocked our customer's work. Thanks in advance. |
|
Re: BOSH OpenStack CPI: planned end of maintenance by end of 2019
Daniel Jones
Hi all, I should imagine there must be enough very large consumers of the OpenStack CPI to make it commercially viable for a small team to be funded that could maintain it, were all said consumers to pull together and contribute what I should imagine would be a small sliver of their total CF expenditure. If any OpenStack CPI users want to talk to EngineerBetter about funded development, we'd be happy to have that conversation as we're doing some similar EOL work for other CF projects. Similarly, if our chums at Anynines, Altoros, S&W, GrapeUp, EVoila, GStack, Armakuni, Novatec or others want to work together on this, we'd be open to that. I can also imagine that some chunk of Pivotal's revenue depends on this CPI, so perhaps some of our teal friends might be interested too? It could be like one of those Marvel films (that I don't watch) where we all team up to vanquish the evil villain of abandoned software. Marco - how many pairs were working on these streams of work, and do you have a feel for the balance of vital maintenance, tech debt, new features, and quality-of-life improvements in the backlog? Regards, Daniel 'Deejay' Jones - CTO +44 (0)79 8000 9153 EngineerBetter Ltd - More than cloud platform specialists On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 at 09:38, Marco Voelz <marco.voelz@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Bosh AlibabaCloud light stemcell has not been imported to provide community version yet
Mukesh Gadiya
Unfortunately, we have been resource constrained and were not able to get to it. Given it's smaller scope, I just moved it to the top of the backlog so that we get to it as soon as possible. On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 9:32 AM <guimin.hgm@...> wrote: HI Chip and Mukesh, I am sorry for the bothering again. |
|
Re: Bosh AlibabaCloud light stemcell has not been imported to provide community version yet
"何贵民(箫竹)
HI Chip and Mukesh, I am sorry for the bothering again.
I noticed this story https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/167410186 is still in Unstarted and I am very anxious for the story and it is very important for our customers. Is there any ETA for it? Can push up its priority? |
|
BOSH OpenStack CPI: planned end of maintenance by end of 2019
Marco Voelz
Dear Friends of OpenStack,
Since 2015, the BOSH OpenStack CPI [1] is maintained by the BOSH team Europe at SAP. Historically, this made sense, because SAP was a large user of OpenStack, but in the meantime our focus as a company has shifted.
Consequently, we would like to announce that our team at SAP will stop maintaining the BOSH OpenStack CPI and a few related projects like CF OpenStack validator [2] and bosh-openstack-environment-templates [3] *by the end of 2019*. Already starting right now, we are stopping feature work on the BOSH OpenStack CPI. From 2020 on, we will not release any new versions of the CPI, be it for fixing CVEs, ensuring support of new OpenStack versions, or other reasons.
If there is anybody in the community with interest to continue maintenance and development of the BOSH OpenStack CPI and potentially the related projects as well, we're happy to transfer the ownership of projects and CI pipelines. If no maintainer is found for a project, the regular course of action would be to move it to the cloudfoundry-attic organization.
If this is a topic you'd like to talk about, please reach out to us by replying to this mail or contacting me directly.
Warm regards Marco
[1] https://github.com/cloudfoundry/bosh-openstack-cpi-release [2] https://github.com/cloudfoundry-incubator/cf-openstack-validator [3] https://github.com/cloudfoundry-incubator/bosh-openstack-environment-templates |
|
Re: How to prevent compilation VMs from being deleted?
The point is to debug the compile scripts in the VM where they are running.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
There is a way of dealing with VMs being destroyed after the compile script fail :
|
|
Re: Bosh AlibabaCloud light stemcell has not been imported to provide community version yet
"何贵民(箫竹)
HI Mukesh, I noticed this story is still in Unstarted and is there any ETA for it? It is very important for our customers and us. Thanks in advance. |
|
Reminder: BOSH PMC meeting for August tomorrow!
Marco Voelz
Dear friends of BOSH,
This is your friendly reminder that the BOSH PMC meeting for August will happen tomorrow, Aug 15th at 8:00 AM PST/17:00 CEST.
The current preliminary agenda is located at https://github.com/cloudfoundry/pmc-notes/blob/master/Bosh/2019-08-15-bosh.md, if you'd like to bring your own topic, please PR the agenda doc or let us know at the beginning of the call tomorrow.
Looking forward to seeing many of you!
Warm regards Marco
|
|
Re: Bosh AlibabaCloud light stemcell has not been imported to provide community version yet
Mukesh Gadiya
Hi Alicloud folks, The story for publishing on bosh.io is prioritized in the backlog. Please watch this story - https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/167410186. When it's delivered, the alicloud stemcells will be available on bosh.io. Cheers, Mukesh On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 7:09 AM Chip Childers <cchilders@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Bosh AlibabaCloud light stemcell has not been imported to provide community version yet
Chip Childers
+Voelz, Marco ... Marco - think that the BOSH PMC can prioritize this appropriately? Chip Childers, CTO Cloud Foundry Foundation On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 12:33 AM <guimin.hgm@...> wrote: This issue has been talked for a long time in the slack https://cloudfoundry.slack.com/archives/C02HPPYQ2/p1565144830091600?thread_ts=1557828465.233200&cid=C02HPPYQ2, but now it is still not fixed. |
|
Re: Bosh AlibabaCloud light stemcell has not been imported to provide community version yet
"何贵民(箫竹)
This issue has been talked for a long time in the slack https://cloudfoundry.slack.com/archives/C02HPPYQ2/p1565144830091600?thread_ts=1557828465.233200&cid=C02HPPYQ2, but now it is still not fixed.
|
|
Docs Bosh for Alibaba Cloud CPI has not been merged yet
"何贵民(箫竹)
Dear Friends of BOSH,
Same as message #2640, in order integration, we provided the latest docs for bosh AlibabaCloud CPI by PR: https://github.com/cloudfoundry/docs-bosh/pull/429, but now this PR has been closed and I also have resubmitted: https://github.com/cloudfoundry/docs-bosh/pull/667 . I want to know, is there any ETA or plan to review it? If there are any issues, please let us know by github or slack, and we will fix them asap.
We appreciate your comments, thoughts, feedback and suggestions! You can reply on the cf-bosh mailing list or reach out in the ways described in the 'contact' section in the document.
Thanks and warm regards
Guimin, He
|
|