Hi Everyone, Thank you very much for the overwhelming responses and nominating such stellar group of individuals to be track co-chairs for Cloud Foundry Summit North America 2019 to be held in

Dear friends of BOSH, As announced below: The four week grace period is over and we have removed cloudfoundry-incubator releases for the 5 CPIs below. They have been promoted out of the incubator

Dear Cloud Foundry Community, Cloud Foundry Summits are successful, educational, and valuable to our community only because our track co-chair volunteers strive to bring as many high quality talks to

Dear Morgan, I don't have the rights to comment in the attached document, so I guess I'll leave my comments here. We should specifically mention how we're dealing with the case of switching

I'm on board for it so long as Morgan and Frederic are fine with it! Respectfully, Mike Lloyd

Hi Mike and Morgan, Several months ago, we had a discussion with Dimitry to enable Azure Blob storage support for the BOSH director. The codes basically works. And several PRs to Azure CPI,

I think midterm is okay - so long as it's on the roadmap and committed I can be happy. Recently there was an issue I had where the BOSH director was return HTTP 500 for every operation, after some

Hey Mike, We do have a roadmap item to enable Azure Blob Storage support for the BOSH director. That being said, it's looking like it's a midterm roadmap goal in the next few months based on our

Der friends of BOSH, We have moved the below CPIs from the cloudfoundry-incubator to the cloudfoundry github organization. The new releases will soon arrive on bosh.io after adapting its

BOSH Team, Currently the BOSH director supports WebDAV, GCS, and S3 for its Blobstore Providers. Are there plans to add support for Azure Blob Storage? Thanks, Mike Lloyd Pivotal

++1 We would also like a formal way to track CVE's and which specific patch they affect and are fixed in. This would allow us to more easily demonstrate the value we get from BOSH and regular

+1 !! It would be great if you included a formal way to track which CVE s are covered by a given patch version for each stemcell line so it can easily (automatically) be tracked. Mit

That’s great. For us, Azure CPI team, the official support policy for BOSH stemcell is very important and useful. Here are some questions. Looking forward to your guidance. Azure CPI has some logic

Hi CF Community, The BOSH team is working to formalize a policy for Linux stemcell support. Up until now, the team has not had a policy on which stemcell lines are officially supported. We'll also be

Thanks Marco for bring us this good news! JUN Thanks Marco Voelz <marco.voelz@...> 于2018年9月20日周四 下午4:14写道：

Hi everyone, The BOSH PMC voted unanimously in favor of incubating the huaweicloud CPI project. Welcome to Jun and the team! Warm regards Marco

Just a reminder -- the deadline is tomorrow; so please nominate today! Nominate your peers for a Stealth-Ops or Helping Hands award or an end user story for the Coolest User Story award! -- Swarna

Hi Marco, Thanks for giving your opinion. It sounds reasonable for me. I added a backlog [1] which list the priorities for the near future in github issues, and linking it in the project's README. We

Dear Guillaume, dear Jun, I've been following your lively discussion so far with great interest. Let me jump into the question related to extending the OpenStack CPI vs creating your own CPI. In

Folks, We are bringing the Community Awards to Cloud Foundry Summit EU (Basel, Switzerland)! We need your help; please take a minute to nominate your peer(s) today! Nominations close on September