|
Re: OpenSSL v0.9.8 in CF Ruby Buildpack 1.4
OK, that makes sense.
It sounds like you're installing the web app on the bare VM, and not in a
container rootfs. This isn't really a supported use case for the Buildpack,
which is going to make
OK, that makes sense.
It sounds like you're installing the web app on the bare VM, and not in a
container rootfs. This isn't really a supported use case for the Buildpack,
which is going to make
|
By
Mike Dalessio
·
#77
·
|
|
Re: OpenSSL v0.9.8 in CF Ruby Buildpack 1.4
Hi Mike,
the line
```gem 'jruby-openssl', :platforms => :jruby ```
means jruby-openssl gem will be downloaded by bundler if and only if JRuby
platform is detected, I am using MRI not JRuby.
The
Hi Mike,
the line
```gem 'jruby-openssl', :platforms => :jruby ```
means jruby-openssl gem will be downloaded by bundler if and only if JRuby
platform is detected, I am using MRI not JRuby.
The
|
By
Daya Sharma <dsharma@...>
·
#76
·
|
|
Re: OpenSSL v0.9.8 in CF Ruby Buildpack 1.4
Hi Daya,
I'm a bit confused, as it looks from your Gemfile like you're trying to
load a JRuby openssl gem while running MRI ruby.
What happens if you remove your dependency on the `jruby-openssl`
Hi Daya,
I'm a bit confused, as it looks from your Gemfile like you're trying to
load a JRuby openssl gem while running MRI ruby.
What happens if you remove your dependency on the `jruby-openssl`
|
By
Mike Dalessio
·
#75
·
|
|
Re: OpenSSL v0.9.8 in CF Ruby Buildpack 1.4
testing_openssl.rb mentioned previously is here
https://gist.github.com/daya/71a589f9b83f9ff57608
CloudFoundry Ruby Build Pack 1.4
https://github.com/cloudfoundry/ruby-buildpack/releases/tag/v1.4.0
testing_openssl.rb mentioned previously is here
https://gist.github.com/daya/71a589f9b83f9ff57608
CloudFoundry Ruby Build Pack 1.4
https://github.com/cloudfoundry/ruby-buildpack/releases/tag/v1.4.0
|
By
Daya Sharma <dsharma@...>
·
#74
·
|
|
OpenSSL v0.9.8 in CF Ruby Buildpack 1.4
Hi
There is a OpenSSL version/dependency mismatch as far as Ruby BuildPack and
Stemcells are concerned
Our bosh-lite environment is
*StemCell*:
Name:
Hi
There is a OpenSSL version/dependency mismatch as far as Ruby BuildPack and
Stemcells are concerned
Our bosh-lite environment is
*StemCell*:
Name:
|
By
Daya Sharma <dsharma@...>
·
#73
·
|
|
Re: [cf-lattice] [cf-dev] Links to Nabble archives of the CF lists
aaron,
i added a page on the cf community wiki with your links:
https://github.com/cloudfoundry-community/cf-docs-contrib/wiki/Mailing-Lists
wrote:
--
Thank you,
James Bayer
aaron,
i added a page on the cf community wiki with your links:
https://github.com/cloudfoundry-community/cf-docs-contrib/wiki/Mailing-Lists
wrote:
--
Thank you,
James Bayer
|
By
James Bayer
·
#72
·
|
|
Re: Issue on re-deploy to AWS - static IP already reserved/in use
We had the similar issue with AWS. In AWS pannel we couldn't find any
instance that used some IP address, still there was no ability to create an
instance with such IP. We got this bug after we
We had the similar issue with AWS. In AWS pannel we couldn't find any
instance that used some IP address, still there was no ability to create an
instance with such IP. We got this bug after we
|
By
Alexander Lomov
·
#71
·
|
|
Re: Deploy CF Diego Release on OpenStack
Thanks.
By
王天青 <wang.tianqing.cn at gmail.com...>
·
#70
·
|
|
Re: Deploy CF Diego Release on OpenStack
Might want to cross-post this to cf-dev.
Might want to cross-post this to cf-dev.
|
By
Dmitriy Kalinin
·
#69
·
|
|
Re: Issue on re-deploy to AWS - static IP already reserved/in use
Was that IP previously assigned to a different VM (check via `bosh vms`)?
Currently BOSH does not allow to pick a static IP if it's already in use by
another VM. You could try putting it as a
Was that IP previously assigned to a different VM (check via `bosh vms`)?
Currently BOSH does not allow to pick a static IP if it's already in use by
another VM. You could try putting it as a
|
By
Dmitriy Kalinin
·
#68
·
|
|
Re: Issue on re-deploy to AWS - static IP already reserved/in use
Have you terminated the previous Amazon HA Proxy instance? If not, this
might be the reason of the reserved IP error.
--
Lev Berman
Altoros - Cloud Foundry deployment, training and
Have you terminated the previous Amazon HA Proxy instance? If not, this
might be the reason of the reserved IP error.
--
Lev Berman
Altoros - Cloud Foundry deployment, training and
|
By
Lev Berman
·
#67
·
|
|
Issue on re-deploy to AWS - static IP already reserved/in use
Hi BOSH users!
We're running into an error when attempting to re-deploy a failing BOSH
deployment of CF to AWS:
`ha_proxy_z1/0' asked for a static IP 52.28.90.12 but it's already
reserved/in
Hi BOSH users!
We're running into an error when attempting to re-deploy a failing BOSH
deployment of CF to AWS:
`ha_proxy_z1/0' asked for a static IP 52.28.90.12 but it's already
reserved/in
|
By
Ed
·
#66
·
|
|
Deploy CF Diego Release on OpenStack
Hi all,
When deploying Cloud Foundry on OpenStack using BOSH, there is a good
reference doc:
http://docs.cloudfoundry.org/deploying/openstack/install_cf_openstack.html.
For Diego release, is there
Hi all,
When deploying Cloud Foundry on OpenStack using BOSH, there is a good
reference doc:
http://docs.cloudfoundry.org/deploying/openstack/install_cf_openstack.html.
For Diego release, is there
|
By
王天青 <wang.tianqing.cn at gmail.com...>
·
#65
·
|
|
Re: [cf-dev] Links to Nabble archives of the CF lists
+! nice job!
Cheers,
Christopher Ferris
IBM Distinguished Engineer, CTO Open Cloud
IBM Software Group, Open Technologies
email: chrisfer(a)us.ibm.com
twitter: @christo4ferris
blog:
+! nice job!
Cheers,
Christopher Ferris
IBM Distinguished Engineer, CTO Open Cloud
IBM Software Group, Open Technologies
email: chrisfer(a)us.ibm.com
twitter: @christo4ferris
blog:
|
By
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@...>
·
#64
·
|
|
Re: Links to Nabble archives of the CF lists
Thanks Aaron!
Chip Childers | Technology Chief of Staff | Cloud Foundry Foundation
wrote:
Thanks Aaron!
Chip Childers | Technology Chief of Staff | Cloud Foundry Foundation
wrote:
|
By
Chip Childers
·
#63
·
|
|
Re: Links to Nabble archives of the CF lists
+1
Nice work Aaron!
wrote:
+1
Nice work Aaron!
wrote:
|
By
Dieu Cao <dcao@...>
·
#62
·
|
|
Links to Nabble archives of the CF lists
I've created Nabble archives of the CF lists here:
http://cf-bosh.70367.x6.nabble.com/
http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/
http://cf-lattice.70370.x6.nabble.com/
The archives are searchable and allow
I've created Nabble archives of the CF lists here:
http://cf-bosh.70367.x6.nabble.com/
http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/
http://cf-lattice.70370.x6.nabble.com/
The archives are searchable and allow
|
By
Aaron Huber
·
#61
·
|
|
Re: Best practices around porting CF to RHEL/SLES?
Thanks Dmitriy - I guess with DEA not working there won't be any
functioning CF on CentOS/RHEL.
I wonder if SLES has better CF story at this point (in terms of porting)?
Thanks Dmitriy - I guess with DEA not working there won't be any
functioning CF on CentOS/RHEL.
I wonder if SLES has better CF story at this point (in terms of porting)?
|
By
Rishi Misra <misra.rishi@...>
·
#60
·
|
|
Re: Best practices around porting CF to RHEL/SLES?
Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime can only be deployed at this point on Ubuntu
Trusty stemcell. All components work of ER work on CentOS stemcell except
the DEA (component that runs applications) due to
Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime can only be deployed at this point on Ubuntu
Trusty stemcell. All components work of ER work on CentOS stemcell except
the DEA (component that runs applications) due to
|
By
Dmitriy Kalinin
·
#59
·
|
|
Re: Full text search for the mailing list?
I put in a request with markmail.org.
Dan
wrote:
I put in a request with markmail.org.
Dan
wrote:
|
By
Daniel Mikusa
·
#58
·
|