Guys, I'm not saying that the director is bad or wrong, actually what I want is maybe to improve it a little bit without touching the logic or the api, my final goal is maybe to create a drop in

Dear Leandro, I'd love to see your experiment grow – keep in mind that the Director is around for quite a while and has some pretty complicated corner cases. Just like any rewrite: It is pretty

What kind of downtime are they seeing when upgrading the BOSH director? IIRC there were things like binary-bosh to keep bosh alive + responsive all the time, but in practice, the main cause of

OK what you quote is certainly amazing, anyway that only tackle the Scalability in part (I know for sure that elixir/erlang can hold the same a lot better) but it didn't solve the Fault Tolerance part

I think you first have to ask what real (as opposed to theoretical) problems does current bosh director have, where the effort required to fix them is such that it would be more efficient (in terms

FWIW, we've managed BOSHes with many deployments, some of which consist of ~1000 VMs, and not seen any direct performance issues of the BOSH director. Just lengthy deploys due to having so many VMs to

After more than 6 months working with elixir in prod, it crossed my mind that maybe it deserves some time of experiment and think on the possibility of a *TOTAL REWRITE OF BOSH DIRECTOR USING

Awesome work and huge congratulations! ________________________________ Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 12:02:06 AM To: cf-bosh(a)lists.cloudfoundry.org Subject: [cf-bosh] BOSH Windows is now GA Hi

Hi cf-bosh, BOSH Windows, the new deployment mechanism for Windows cells, is now generally available. About BOSH Windows: At this point BOSH Windows has been successfully running 100% of the CI/CD

Thanks Stanislav, this is a bad news. :( I'm trying to use vSphere to do the installation. Thanks again.

Thanks Sze Siong Teo, I will test this.

Unless you really have problem using vagrant to setup bosh-lite, then you can setup the bosh-lite VM is a slightly more manual way. You can download this and create a VM manually then use it as your

] Unable to perform this action. Contact your cloud administrator." minorErrorCode="INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR" you might have to contact vcloud support to understand root cause of this error.

Dear Adrian, Thanks for your feedback. The screenshot didnot showup in the web. Could you please send again? about you mentioned: Select the 'Enable VT-x/AMD-V' option, because i'm in the VM

VirtualBox does not support nested virtualization https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/4032.

I'd not install it in the vm. Just use vagrant to start the bosh-lite on the same host. So you have two vms: 1. You Ubuntu vm, 2. A bosh-lite I used this setup myself to start developing bosh

Is there any ETA for the BOSH cli v1 deprecation? Thanks, Leandro.-

We're currently trying to deploying Single-VM Bosh Director on vCloud Director with bosh-init for one of our test environments and we ran into the error on attaching disk to the VM. vCloud Director

Dear Adrian, Thanks a lot for your feedback. because i do not have enough HW resource, i can not install Ubuntu to a phical server. Could you please share how can i "enable the virtualization

Thanks Rob I'll see if I can add it over the weekend. 2017-04-21 3:52 GMT+02:00 Gwenn Etourneau <getourneau(a)pivotal.io>: